subscribesubscriber servicescontact usabout ussite mapBuy a Classified
Thu, Jul 24 2008 

Published: October 03, 2006 02:39 pm    print this story   email this story  

Letter to the Editor - September 21, 2006

The Tuttle Times

To the Editor:

As reported in last week’s Tuttle Times, Board Member Bruce Long, voiced an opinion during a school board meeting stating “Our Band is dressed terrible…If we want to get a positive image, we have got to do a better job.” I am a parent of a band member and happen to be married to the President of the Tuttle Band Boosters. While this statement is an opinion and may seem true, it frustrates me and others. It is nearly impossible to count the number of times the Tuttle Band Booster organization has plead with school officials and the school board for support for the band.

What really looks terrible is the supported program of the Tuttle Band. I am not sure Mr. Long or any board member for that matter understands that holding band during one of the block times in the high school guarantees failure for the program. These students must choose between required classes, and a few electives including band. I myself have encouraged my daughter not to take band each semester because to get into a good college, she must have good electives on her transcripts. So unfortunately, band suffers, and I care about the band. When you have a student body the size of Tuttle, you should have a better band. So what happened?

Consider the 2005-2006 numbers: Sixth grade had 30 members, seventh grade had 10 members, and eighth grade through twelfth had 16 members combined. The horrible fall out is partly the program and mostly the scheduling according Laura Dobie, Band Booster President. “Many parents find it difficult to have their student take band in high school because of the block scheduling,” said Dobie.

This parent has additional opinions. It seemed that every time the Band Boosters raised money to enhance the program, they were denied the opportunity because of some other support organization. Take last year as an example. The Band Boosters made and sold cinnamon rolls during football games, which was a non-competitive item to the concession stand’s products. The cinnamon rolls were a great success. This year, the Football Boosters denied the Band Boosters from selling the rolls saying it competed with the Football Boosters concessions, even though they did not nor do not sell any such item. As an alternative, as reported by the an attendee of the last Football Boosters meeting, the Football Boosters promised the band 50% of the amount collected from the sales of programs for this year. What happened after the first game? The Band Boosters sold all 100 programs, and received the $50 dollars. Last year, the Band Boosters earned over $300 per game on the cinnamon rolls. How is that fair?

If the school board wants a better band, they need a friendlier band program. I would suggest that Mr. Long do some studying and take some positive action to improve the band before criticizing. After all, that is why he was elected.

Cameron Dobie

print this story   email this story  



wheels
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Premium Jobs

Come Join the Team!
Come join our Home Health team!!! Competitive Wages
Gentiva Heath Services
Now Hiring
Part Time RN/LPN...>MORE

See all ads

Premium Extras

Make Easy Money Fast!
Grady Co. participants needed for a One-day focus group discussion. Tuesday, October 10th, 7am-7pm, in OKC. $150 for p...>MORE

See all ads


 

Community Newspaper Holdings, Inc.CNHI Classified Advertising NetworkCNHI News Service
Associated Press content © 2008. All rights reserved. AP content may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Our site is powered by Zope and our Internet Yellow Pages site is powered by PremierGuide.
Some parts of our site may require you to download the Flash Player Plugin.
View our Privacy Policy
Advertiser index

rc